First Video - My major critique: Not an interactive conversation. Instead it is a series of readings by three different students. Except for the common use of the green screen background, it is not a cooperative podcast or conversation.
Second video - In general the same critique applies except the two students in this segment talked more and read less which was better. Nevertheless it was a serial presentation and that fact was highlighted by two different backgrounds. And why the water?
Covers content thoroughly. The summary slides help but we miss any interaction or summary that is the result of a group conversation and discussion.
Used green screen which sometimes mades sense (first video) but not second.
The second video appears not to have been edited (or ended) properly. The screen goes black and the audio ends at 09:33 and remains black until 14:19 when we have a second of background and then at 14:22-23 when we see Keilan and the background. There is no fade out and the video ends at 14:23.
First Video - My major critique: Not an interactive conversation. Instead it is a series of readings by three different students. Except for the common use of the green screen background, it is not a cooperative podcast or conversation.
ReplyDeleteSecond video - In general the same critique applies except the two students in this segment talked more and read less which was better. Nevertheless it was a serial presentation and that fact was highlighted by two different backgrounds. And why the water?
Covers content thoroughly. The summary slides help but we miss any interaction or summary that is the result of a group conversation and discussion.
Used green screen which sometimes mades sense (first video) but not second.
The second video appears not to have been edited (or ended) properly. The screen goes black and the audio ends at 09:33 and remains black until 14:19 when we have a second of background and then at 14:22-23 when we see Keilan and the background. There is no fade out and the video ends at 14:23.